Clarifying user request
The user's message likely includes a news headline and a mention of the FM26 rating. I'm wondering if they want me to write an article or make a statement. It's best to ask for clarification: Do they want a summary, verification, or a write-up?
I should explain what the rating means and caution about inaccuracies. Since scoring 5 goals in the UEFA Youth League is rare, I’ll ask which "卢卡" they’re referring to, as there are multiple Lukas associated with Tottenham.Proposing options
I can suggest a few options: 1) Draft a short news article or Weibo post; 2) Compile a player profile; 3) Create an FM wonderkid scouting report with training roles and attributes; or 4) Verify the match details.
To proceed, I need to ask for the player's full name and whether they prefer a news copy or an analysis. I should explain the FM rating of -9.5 as roughly equivalent to a 170–200 potential ability, which is near the wonderkid tier.Confirming player details
I’m not sure about the player’s position, but since they scored 5 goals, they’re likely a forward. However, there are multiple youth forwards at Tottenham, and I’d better avoid specifics to prevent confusion.
I can confirm that in FM, the rating -9.5 is recognized, especially in Chinese communities, where it often substitutes the real scale of -95. I can offer two deliverables: a short news piece and a longer article, plus an FM training suggestion. I'll also create a template for social media posts.
这是个大新闻!要我帮你写条快讯/长文稿/社媒文案,还是做一份 FM 生涯建队/培养建议?
先说明两个要点:
如果你要精确稿件,请告知球员全名、比赛日期、对手与最终比分。我可以先给你一版通用可替换文案:

社媒快讯(可直接发) “热刺U19小将卢卡在欧冠青年联赛暴走,单场独中五元!据传 FM26 给予 -9.5 顶级潜力评定,直逼 -10 神童档。北伦敦又一颗超新星,拭目以待他的一线队首秀。”
短稿(媒体/社区帖) “热刺青训再出爆点。小将卢卡在欧冠青年联赛单场打进5球,几乎以一己之力终结比赛。据社区爆料与球探口径,他在 FM26 的潜力值将达 -9.5(约等同 170–200 动态上限),已步入世界级潜力行列。青年赛场的数据虽需与成年对抗做折算,但这一表现足以加速他的一线队路径与外界关注。”

FM 生涯建议(通用,等你确认其位置后我可细化)
需要我:
发我球员全名和位置,我就按你选的方向完善。
